1.3 out of 5
Google doesn't verify reviews. Learn more about results and reviews.
- All reviews
- Recent
- Helpful
- Highest to lowest rating
- Lowest to highest rating
- English
- All languages
Jimmy ThamNov 2, 2024
Doesn't work as intended
Luke Nelson (luc122c)Oct 29, 2024
I now need an app AND a browser extension to view modern files? No thank you.
Tomasz PurtakOct 27, 2024
Guys, commenting here, you don't understant codecs. Having no clue, right ? Okay, see, this solution works better. First of all, media is sent across the network in the compressed way, rather then in less efficient in size package, that the NAS had to "unpack it" to. So you had to choose among qualities when playing it back, because it was downgraded, to ratain smaller network throughput or if you happened to chose the original quality - the bandwith demand was grater. What it resulted with ... Show more
Max PackOct 24, 2024
For $5 they’ve disgusted people who invest hundreds/thousands in their products. Absolute joke...
Vlad ChizhOct 24, 2024
This is sadness and frustration. Seriously, they could have at least offered the decoding feature for an additional $5, but not this hoop-jumping. Shame!
KurtOct 22, 2024
You should be ashamed, Synology!!!!!
Brian BenthamOct 22, 2024
Users are a lot smarter than Synology is giving them credit for, and it's super-obvious to anyone with a brain Synology jsut doesn't want to pay for the codecs to run on the NAS anymore. It's ridiculous to have to install a background application on the PC and browser extension in each browser, just to get exactly the same functionality which used to reside on my NAS. This is yet another example of a company retroactively changing the features of a product I purchased from them a long time ago.
John InwoodOct 18, 2024
Cant believe I am having to do this... Just charge a $5 for the codec
Yves ChanSep 25, 2024
This is not what I paid for
J. K.Sep 15, 2024
Why are features we're used to using being removed? Definitely a downgrade