4 out of 5
Google doesn't verify reviews. Learn more about results and reviews.
- All reviews
- Recent
- Helpful
- Highest to lowest rating
- Lowest to highest rating
- English
- All languages
Ghanbari AfsaneMay 27, 2024
Amazing, Thank you very much....
Sami Khalifé-SayahJan 30, 2024
dont work
Elahe DerakhshiNov 29, 2023
what the hell is payment before starting free trial?
Msc EcoNov 26, 2023
Ineffective; read reviews, but discovered that payment is required upfront, even for the trial. A proper trial should allow users to experience the service first, and after 7 days, request banking information only if the user is satisfied with SCite.
Neo IzumiyamaJun 27, 2023
useless, cannot help me
Antoine LemercierApr 21, 2023
Doesn't work on chromium anymore. Feel sad, that was helpful.
朱岳鑫Apr 21, 2023
chrome 112.0.5615.138 cannot use scite
Gert van den BergNov 10, 2021
Was useful, now way too expensive for someone that is using it to try to make sense science, without being paid to do so. It promised making it much easier to check how a paper was received, but now has the same paywall issues as many journals.
Neri MarsiliJul 1, 2021
Maybe it is in my subfield (linguistics/psychology), but it gets everything wrong. It fails to identify most supporting and contrasting citation. When it classifies one as such, is oftentimes incorrect (e.g. the citation is not actually supportive) or misleading (e.g. a self-citation of previous research). Scite would be a really cool instrument; but at its current state, it does not seem to work for entire, massive fields of studies.
Dmitriy NikitinFeb 3, 2021
Very easy to use and helps increase productivity when doing literature reviews