Lempod

Worst product, payment submission or boost post doesn't work, they charged $31 and of no use

Not working at all, waste of money

All time favorite for lead generation. Very effective and user friendly.

Great platform for LinkedIn, customer service was great too!

Lempod has been an incredibly useful resource for improving my LinkedIn views and connections, and amplifying my post engagement.

Amazing tool for getting good engagement from genuine profiles; if you go ahead and then connect with people on the platform in your pod, you can network and get further career and industry growth! The best tool for REAL engagement!

Banned my account. Service was prompt and helpful however.

I want to WARN you that the subscription model this guy runs is a total scam! They ask for "Top-up" money in advance and then start charging your card with double amounts. When you ask what happened, they just assure you that it was on your balance for future use, but that balance would never be used since they do the same every month! THIS IS FRAUD - BE AWARE!

Scammers and disgusting app. Complete fraud and blame customers back for the use. It is a complete scam website. Stay away. Linkedin blocked the account for using it. They will ban you. Now they will claim below that i do not have an account or i did not use. Inappropriate behavour and blame game on customers is common. They blame other people and when we give 1 start they shout on us. The community is a bot AI community using other people Linkedin accounts. Guys you can see their behaviour b... Show more

Update: 22-June-2024: I have received my money back. Now this is slap to this scammer from the bank. A 90 days+ investigation has identified that this was a scam and fraud and they had refunded back my whole amount. I suggest anyone who pays to this company should raise complaint with their banks to get their money bank. Never pay them through debit card as bank won't take any responsibility. However, now Scott you jump or scream. The truth has been infront of everyone. This could have been ... Show more