2.7 out of 5
Google doesn't verify reviews. Learn more about results and reviews.
- All reviews
- Recent
- Helpful
- Highest to lowest rating
- Lowest to highest rating
- English
- All languages
Jeremiah AlbrightAug 26, 2024
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Usable as a starting point, but doesn't work out of the box. 2nd XML Line with package tag ending with : " when it should be > and certain entity types are not named properly such as CustomField as customfielddefinition, also version 47 is pretty outdated, and numerous other issues that non-Salesforce Devs wont be able to fix easily
Thank you for taking the time to provide your feedback. We’re sorry to hear that you encountered these issues and that your experience with our app wasn’t up to your expectations. We appreciate you pointing out the specific concerns with the XML line and entity naming. We're working on an update to address these issues and ensure smoother functionality out of the box. If you're open to it, we’d love to assist you directly in resolving these challenges. Please reach out to our support team at support@satrangtech.com so we can help make this a better experience for you. Thanks again for your valuable feedback, and we’re committed to making the necessary improvements.
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Dipa BhattacharjeeSep 27, 2022
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
This generates faulty package.xml
Hi Dipa, Can you please help us with specific detail on what was fault, which tag didn't generate properly. Also, can you please raise the ticket @ http://support.satrangtech.com/ so we can discuss the issue in detail? With that, we will have an option to revert to you as well. Thanks Chirag
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Will MSep 9, 2022
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Seems like it still doesn't work for Custom Fields. The field names were present in the XML but no attributes.
Hi Will, Can you please raise the ticket @ http://support.satrangtech.com/ so we can discuss the custom field issue in detail? With that, we will have an option to revert to you as well. Thanks Chirag
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Kyle HandleyOct 15, 2020
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Good idea, some bugs.
Hi Kyle, Can you please raise the ticket @ http://support.satrangtech.com/ with the bug details so we can discuss the bugs? With that, we will have an option to revert to you. Thanks Chirag
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Maggie AlbertsSep 3, 2020
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Unfortunately, I didn't even get a valid XML file, much less a valid package. I just had 1 Custom Object, 12 Custom fields and 1 Process Builder. The XML was not well-formed, the tags were not right and the API names were not used.
Hi Maggie, Can you please raise the ticket @ http://support.satrangtech.com/ so we can discuss the ill-formed XML generated? Apologies for the inconvenience it may have caused. With that ticket, we will also have an option to revert to you. Thanks Chirag
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Subhash AtluriJul 29, 2020
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
This is good
Thanks Subhash!
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
ToufikSep 17, 2019
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Hello The add-on is missing multi-language support : for instance, when you download a package.xml in french, the type name for Apex classes is ClasseApex instead of ApexClass It seems also that it doesn't download profiles into the package file Thanks
Hi Toufix, Thank you for your feedback. We aren't supporting multi-language yet. Will forward your feedback to team. Your input is valuable, and we appreciate your patience as we make these improvements. Best regards, Chirag
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Patrick VisniewskiSep 5, 2019
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
it doesn't work for custom fields or record types basically it created a generic section for each and just listed the dev/api name for each but lacked all object reference so the download of metadata skipped them completely So for example a change set with a field named "Trade" on multiple different objects just resulted in this, which failed completely because it has no information about which objects the fields are on <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Package xmlns="http://soap.sforc... Show more
We've released v6.0.0 and in that, we have added lightning support and code fixes. Thanks!
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Huilong “Eddy” ZhuoAug 12, 2019
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
The download button work only in classic but not in lightning platform. Thank you for creating this tool for us developers!
We've released v6.0.0 and in that, we have added lightning support and code fixes. Thanks!
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
Maciej SzymczakAug 9, 2019
- Report illegal content
- Copy link
This is great!
Thanks a lot! Glad you find it useful! 😊
- Report illegal content
- Copy link