4.0 out of 5
Google doesn't verify reviews. Learn more about results and reviews.
- All reviews
- Recent
- Helpful
- Highest to lowest rating
- Lowest to highest rating
- English
- All languages
Dmytro SavochkinOct 11, 2023
- Report illegal content
Only works with small PRs
Lachlan CooperMay 8, 2023
- Report illegal content
It's nice to see test coverage directly in GitHub, but the extension itself is not very reliable. I often see rendering errors appear at the bottom of PR pages, and files with inline comments are often pushed far over to a single column making them totally unreadable.
Jon WieseSep 28, 2022
- Report illegal content
Permission to access browser history is now required, which is excessive
Wout SlakhorstSep 28, 2022
- Report illegal content
Recent changes require the extension access to your browsing history. This is not acceptable. Update: permissions have been restored as before.
Diego SilvaSep 27, 2022
- Report illegal content
The extension is good, but this new permission to read browser history makes no sense and should not be required.
Brandt LareauMar 25, 2022
- Report illegal content
Not super reliable and it only shows 20 files of coverage even if there are more in the PR. This would not be a problem if there was a way around the limitation but this extension is the only way.
Viktor KövesFeb 9, 2022
- Report illegal content
Is it perfect? No, absolutely not. But it's a super helpful extension that can save you a lot of time running around different sites to understand why your code coverage went down. I do wonder though if a cleaner solution would be to improve the Code Climate site to actually have clear coverage change reports on their end.
isratenedaSep 13, 2021
- Report illegal content
It's useful to see what parts of your code are not tested on GitHub
Leônidas VilleneuveSep 6, 2021
- Report illegal content
Very slow, only shows up to 25 files.
Derek KniffinDec 15, 2020
- Report illegal content
The styles are extremely hard to read in the new Github dark mode.