Support: CMP Validator
Item logo image for CMP Validator

CMP Validator

Featured
4.7(

3 ratings

)

5 support issues

For additional help, check out the developer's support site.

  • All
  • Questions
  • Suggestions
  • Problems

Ioannis Kornarakis

Jan 12, 2024

CMP Validator not populating test results

The validator detects the existence of a CMP API but fails to populate any of the results, on several sites. Here is an example, taken from the official CMP List @ https://iabeurope.eu/cmp-list/ :
https://www.amazon.co.uk/

and an example of a working site for comparison:
https://www.tiempo.com/

In addition, when trying to download the CSV report on a non-working site, I get this error:
Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'technicalComplianceCheck_4')

Is there something obvious I'm missing?

Ramamohan Raju G

Dec 13, 2023

2.2.4 version of CMP validator is trying to load non-existing file

Hi,
Greetings for the day!
The 2.2.4 version of the CMP validator(updated on December 7, 2023), is trying to load a file https://vendor-list.consensu.org/v3/archives/vendor-list-vundefined.json which is giving 403 Forbidden error. Because of this error the CMP validator is not validating the site, can you please let me know if I'm missing something or is there any updated version to be expected with a fix?

Thanks in advance, Ram.

Steve

Aug 5, 2023

No Results

On some sites, the CMP Validator detects a CMP API is present on the page (ie doesn't show the warning when not found on the page), though fails to populate any of the results.

Daniele

Jul 25, 2023

2.1 / 2.2 TCF Version

Why don't you publish a public version for switching to 2.1 / 2.2 validation check ?

Juan Carlos Martínez Expósito

Jul 18, 2023

Ping and RemoveEventListener API commands

Hi,

I'm testing the validator with our own CMP development and I think that the technical compliance check 4 isn't work properly for commands "ping" and "removeEventListener".

There are no changes to any of the commands since tcf v2.0 and reanding tcf v2.2 specification I think that de result is correct.

Could you check this validation?

Thanks.

Google apps